Voice technology is somewhat becoming the new realm in the world of emerging patterns to interact with computational systems to obtain results quickly.
Major advantages of voice include - the free interaction without an aid or interaction mechanism primitive to technology, which means - unless you want to talk and do something else at the time via talk, you have nothing to loose.
But the key question as of today is resting on 2 major observations -
1. Voice doesn't have a common framework - unfortunately it's true - we are living in a world of competitor governed architecture and that has a disadvantage in terms of establishing a common framework just suited to voice.
This in turn introduces delay to make change and also restricts changes to happen seamlessly across all the voice supported systems.
2. Currently we are living in a world of insecurity caused by the ease of having someone present themselves as the owner whereas they might not be. Security has become the prime concern and with voice systems the challenge becomes bigger.
Current voice artefacts have the capability to be replicated and processed with variations, consider a program using that to trigger a hack and cause complete disruption of systems. Voice biometrics have a far way to go but more important here is the ledger of trigger of transactions via voice which gives a trust on the transaction invoked.
This is where blockchain comes into picture, making sure each iteration or change in the voice pattern received is ultimately managed via blocks recorded over a period of time.
As this technology is new - it is easy to fundamentally implement this and have a method to enforce this into the architecture but it also means that the major firms have to understand the implications so that adoption is quicker.. it's high time voice starts thinking blockchain..
Major advantages of voice include - the free interaction without an aid or interaction mechanism primitive to technology, which means - unless you want to talk and do something else at the time via talk, you have nothing to loose.
But the key question as of today is resting on 2 major observations -
1. Voice doesn't have a common framework - unfortunately it's true - we are living in a world of competitor governed architecture and that has a disadvantage in terms of establishing a common framework just suited to voice.
This in turn introduces delay to make change and also restricts changes to happen seamlessly across all the voice supported systems.
2. Currently we are living in a world of insecurity caused by the ease of having someone present themselves as the owner whereas they might not be. Security has become the prime concern and with voice systems the challenge becomes bigger.
Current voice artefacts have the capability to be replicated and processed with variations, consider a program using that to trigger a hack and cause complete disruption of systems. Voice biometrics have a far way to go but more important here is the ledger of trigger of transactions via voice which gives a trust on the transaction invoked.
This is where blockchain comes into picture, making sure each iteration or change in the voice pattern received is ultimately managed via blocks recorded over a period of time.
As this technology is new - it is easy to fundamentally implement this and have a method to enforce this into the architecture but it also means that the major firms have to understand the implications so that adoption is quicker.. it's high time voice starts thinking blockchain..
No comments:
Post a Comment